Costa Rican vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,132,009 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 44.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,090 compared to $32,345, a difference of 36.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $75,945, a difference of 35.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $71,697, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $59,383, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $44,003, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 71.4%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 47.4%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.49%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 142.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 134.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 130.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 44.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.83%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.2%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.5%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and 11th grade (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 40.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%).