Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,437,116 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.849. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 40.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $32,345, a difference of 22.2%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $31,489, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $75,945, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $59,383, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $44,003, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 72.8%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 53.3%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 142.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 135.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 132.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 34.8%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 0.040%), currently married (43.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households (61.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 61.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 45.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.2%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.49%), high school diploma (88.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and 11th grade (91.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.8%).