Israeli vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,893,249 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.870% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to an increase of 869.8 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,596 compared to $32,345, a difference of 62.6%), median male earnings ($63,228 compared to $41,758, a difference of 51.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,186 compared to $75,945, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $59,383, a difference of 12.2%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $44,003, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 70.6%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 42.8%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 163.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 127.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 123.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 64.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 5.3%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 78.8%), no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 69.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 57.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 141.2%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 133.2%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 103.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.11%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 54.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.3%).