Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,466,041 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.554. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 23.7 Immigrants from Vietnam.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $100,535, a difference of 22.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $106,417, a difference of 21.3%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $91,987, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $55,562, a difference of 7.8%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $40,153, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 39.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 38.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.40 compared to 3.38, a difference of 0.78%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.0%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and bachelor's degree (31.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.63%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%).