Cuban vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,587,221 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 48.0 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $119,955, a difference of 41.2%), householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $68,822, a difference of 40.0%), and median household income ($73,392 compared to $101,681, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $57,003, a difference of 12.5%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $44,586, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 88.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 54.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.8%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 47.1%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.28, a difference of 0.89%), family households (67.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 76.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Asian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%).