Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cuban
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cubans

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Fair
Fair
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Cuban Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,678,551 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Cuban Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $57,114, a difference of 16.2%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $94,472, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $38,028, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $48,749, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $91,385, a difference of 5.9%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricCubanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,383
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,981
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,392
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,619
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,580
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,942
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,655
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,483
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,301
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,152
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Exceptional
22.8%

Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 48.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.1%), and receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.38%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricCubanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.0%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
12.9%

Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.1%), male unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCubanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.2%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%

Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCubanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.5%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.0%

Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 19.8%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and family households (67.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.6% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 0.78%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCubanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.4%
Poor
32.9%

Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCubanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.3%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
6.2%

Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.020%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricCubanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.6%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Poor
1.7%

Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.95%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Cuban vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricCubanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Average
11.7%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%