Navajo vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,887,974 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 12.9 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Asian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $50,057, a difference of 72.4%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $101,681, a difference of 71.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $118,426, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 20.4%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $57,003, a difference of 34.5%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $44,586, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Asian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 154.4%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 143.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 126.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 54.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 61.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 66.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 112.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 105.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 102.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 92.3%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 58.2%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.28, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Asian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 95.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 91.7%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Asian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 69.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.1%).