Slavic vs Asian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Asian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Asians

Good
Excellent
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Asian Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,747,739 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.517% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to a decrease of 516.6 Asians.
Slavic Integration in Asian Communities

Slavic vs Asian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,398 compared to $101,681, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $112,666, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $118,426, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.9%), per capita income ($45,049 compared to $50,057, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $68,822, a difference of 11.5%).
Slavic vs Asian Income
Income MetricSlavicAsian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Exceptional
$50,057
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Exceptional
$119,955
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Exceptional
$101,681
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Exceptional
$53,690
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Exceptional
$63,827
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Exceptional
$44,586
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Exceptional
$57,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Exceptional
$112,666
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Exceptional
$118,426
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Exceptional
$68,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
26.9%

Slavic vs Asian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.6%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Slavic vs Asian Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicAsian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
26.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.7%

Slavic vs Asian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Slavic vs Asian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicAsian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Slavic vs Asian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Slavic vs Asian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicAsian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Slavic vs Asian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 18.0%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Slavic vs Asian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicAsian
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
26.8%

Slavic vs Asian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Slavic vs Asian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicAsian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Slavic vs Asian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%).
Slavic vs Asian Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicAsian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Good
91.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Good
89.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Exceptional
69.4%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
52.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
44.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
18.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.4%

Slavic vs Asian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Slavic vs Asian Disability
Disability MetricSlavicAsian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%