Austrian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,029,772 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.210% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to a decrease of 210.4 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,339 compared to $101,681, a difference of 11.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,842 compared to $112,666, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $57,003, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($48,116 compared to $50,057, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $68,822, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 17.5%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 15.9%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.60%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.24%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.9%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%).