Jordanian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,187,437 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.258% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 1,258.3 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $112,666, a difference of 13.6%), median household income ($91,794 compared to $101,681, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $57,003, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.51%), householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $68,822, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $44,586, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.9%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.7%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.21%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.9%).