Uruguayan vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,589,684 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.310% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to a decrease of 309.7 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $112,666, a difference of 20.3%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $101,681, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $118,426, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $57,003, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($44,318 compared to $50,057, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.4%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 23.6%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.3%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.5%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.55%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.5%).