Houma vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 1,352,753 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.259% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 259.5 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $118,426, a difference of 64.3%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $101,681, a difference of 62.5%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $119,955, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $63,827, a difference of 26.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $57,003, a difference of 28.5%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $53,690, a difference of 37.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 109.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 99.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 35.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 78.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 56.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 73.8%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.28, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 153.5%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 148.6%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 133.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.26%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 99.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 88.4%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.4%).