Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,337,030 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,034 compared to $104,966, a difference of 19.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $102,190, a difference of 17.8%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $55,615, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $52,611, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $40,704, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 75.0%), receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 61.7%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.4%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 31.8%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (65.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.5%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.3%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.8%), ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.4%).