Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,706,422 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 18.7 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $103,954, a difference of 26.2%), median household income ($74,847 compared to $93,933, a difference of 25.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $106,952, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($37,699 compared to $42,694, a difference of 13.3%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $54,958, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (21.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 63.8%), single male poverty (17.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 58.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 28.0%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and male unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 33.6%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.45, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.2% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 48.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.3%), college, under 1 year (59.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and college, 1 year or more (53.5% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 45.2%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.15%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.8%).