Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,834,316 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.573% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 572.5 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $100,141, a difference of 15.4%), per capita income ($37,699 compared to $43,464, a difference of 15.3%), and median family income ($88,034 compared to $101,354, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $52,643, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $39,186, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.7%), family poverty (13.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.8%), and receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 17.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 16.8%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 30.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.41%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.92%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 7.8%).