Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,200,217 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.697% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 697.3 Immigrants from Vietnam.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,847 compared to $91,987, a difference of 22.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $106,417, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $100,535, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $40,153, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($41,474 compared to $47,282, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.7%), receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 55.7%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.8%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 45.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 33.1%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.38, a difference of 0.94%), family households (65.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 72.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 17.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (96.2% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and 6th grade (95.1% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.7%).