Central American Indian vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,626,281 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.836. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 46.8 Immigrants from France.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $54,557, a difference of 44.7%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $120,076, a difference of 36.4%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $63,715, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $53,805, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $44,541, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 76.6%), receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 69.6%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 5.7%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.7%), births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (65.2% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.15, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 87.4%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 87.3%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.0%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.9%).