Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,966,876 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.659. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.139% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 139.1 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,034 compared to $99,840, a difference of 13.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $60,217, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $97,400, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $50,645, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $38,810, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.0%), receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 37.9%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 18.9%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 40.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 4.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.2%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.9%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.6%), ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.6%).