Brazilian vs Jordanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Jordanians

Good
Exceptional
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Jordanian Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,542,438 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 4.5 Jordanians.
Brazilian Integration in Jordanian Communities

Brazilian vs Jordanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $51,796, a difference of 4.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $109,376, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $64,313, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.25%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $99,186, a difference of 0.94%), and per capita income ($46,700 compared to $45,605, a difference of 2.4%).
Brazilian vs Jordanian Income
Income MetricBrazilianJordanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Excellent
$45,605
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Exceptional
$109,865
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Exceptional
$91,794
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Exceptional
$49,632
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Exceptional
$58,500
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Exceptional
$41,464
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Exceptional
$99,186
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Exceptional
$109,376
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Exceptional
$64,313
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.8%

Brazilian vs Jordanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.21%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Brazilian vs Jordanian Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianJordanian
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
10.2%

Brazilian vs Jordanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Brazilian vs Jordanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianJordanian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%

Brazilian vs Jordanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
Brazilian vs Jordanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianJordanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.4%

Brazilian vs Jordanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Brazilian vs Jordanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianJordanian
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
28.5%

Brazilian vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.5%).
Brazilian vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianJordanian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Brazilian vs Jordanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.2%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%).
Brazilian vs Jordanian Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianJordanian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Excellent
96.4%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
87.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
49.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%

Brazilian vs Jordanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Brazilian vs Jordanian Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianJordanian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%