Navajo vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,496,562 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $41,476, a difference of 42.9%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $80,373, a difference of 35.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $89,748, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.7%), householder income over 65 years ($47,722 compared to $55,598, a difference of 16.5%), and median male earnings ($42,098 compared to $51,376, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 96.1%), married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 86.3%), and single father poverty (29.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 23.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 68.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 67.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and female unemployment (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and single mother households (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (40.1% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 161.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 100.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 18.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 37.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 67.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.8%), bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 49.5%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 86.2%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.9%).