Norwegian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,295,706 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 49.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $91,347, a difference of 13.5%), and median family income ($106,144 compared to $93,988, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $52,437, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($46,865 compared to $45,729, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $40,895, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 76.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 71.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (14.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 59.0%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 51.0%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 53.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.2%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.43%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 282.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 94.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 79.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 22.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 79.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 95.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 48.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.2%).