Bermudan vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,894,457 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.240% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 240.3 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $52,437, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $55,598, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($80,406 compared to $80,373, a difference of 0.040%), median earnings ($45,593 compared to $45,729, a difference of 0.30%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $89,748, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.3%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.59%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.5%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (43.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.13%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 92.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 14.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.0%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%).