Jordanian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,897,820 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.756. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.374% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 374.2 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 38.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $91,347, a difference of 19.7%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $93,988, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $52,437, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $40,895, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($49,632 compared to $45,729, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 55.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.6%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 43.9%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.8%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 188.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 60.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 19.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 42.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.8%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.7%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.1%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.4%).