Fijian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,426,685 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.719. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 90.5 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.5%), median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $40,895, a difference of 16.5%), and median earnings ($40,193 compared to $45,729, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $55,598, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $52,437, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $91,347, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 33.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty (14.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.7%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.92%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 159.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 90.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 17.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 43.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 66.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.9%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.68%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.83%).