Ugandan vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,978,451 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 26.5 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 24.4%), median family income ($106,541 compared to $93,988, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $91,347, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $40,895, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $52,437, a difference of 3.0%), and median earnings ($47,854 compared to $45,729, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 32.4%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.50%), single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.6%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (61.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 115.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.8%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 31.6%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.8%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.99%).