Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,020,289 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 33.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $91,347, a difference of 18.5%), and median household income ($93,093 compared to $80,373, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,496 compared to $40,895, a difference of 0.99%), median earnings ($48,040 compared to $45,729, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $52,437, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 48.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.9%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.1%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother poverty (26.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.71%), family households (67.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 224.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 104.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 76.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 51.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 76.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.5%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.11%), 11th grade (90.7% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and high school diploma (87.0% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%).