Belizean vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,539,363 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.153% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 152.9 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.8%), median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $40,895, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $45,729, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $55,598, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $52,437, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,684 compared to $91,347, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 7.8%), single female poverty (22.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.1%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.2%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (42.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 71.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 11.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.0%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.3%).