African vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,685,888 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 43.7 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $89,748, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $40,895, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,711 compared to $55,598, a difference of 3.5%), median family income ($87,820 compared to $93,988, a difference of 7.0%), and median male earnings ($47,994 compared to $51,376, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.1%), single female poverty (24.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 26.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.3%), births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (41.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 0.14%), married-couple households (40.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 99.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 42.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 36.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.9%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.6%).