Slavic vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,829,297 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.994. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 94.1 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $91,347, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $93,988, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $40,895, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $52,437, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($47,470 compared to $45,729, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 48.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 38.5%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 33.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.6%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 175.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 59.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 43.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.2%).