Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,406,463 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $92,876, a difference of 19.3%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $53,237, a difference of 18.8%), and median household income ($99,933 compared to $85,054, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $52,643, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $39,186, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 23.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.63%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.21%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.1%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.2%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.43%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%).