Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,169,643 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 31.9 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.8%), per capita income ($40,339 compared to $43,464, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $92,876, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $39,186, a difference of 0.28%), householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $59,848, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($45,030 compared to $45,928, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.48%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.5%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 10th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.59%).