Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,402,549 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $43,464, a difference of 17.2%), median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $53,237, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,817 compared to $92,876, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $52,643, a difference of 4.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $59,848, a difference of 8.3%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.1%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 22.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.6%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.33%).