Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,332,137 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,031 compared to $53,237, a difference of 39.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $92,876, a difference of 39.0%), and median household income ($116,460 compared to $85,054, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $52,643, a difference of 12.9%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $39,186, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 66.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 51.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 8.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and single father poverty (13.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 45.0%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 43.7%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (68.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 32.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 79.4%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 61.2%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.2%).