Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,446,352 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $100,141, a difference of 10.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $92,876, a difference of 10.3%), and median household income ($77,631 compared to $85,054, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $39,186, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($44,118 compared to $45,928, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $53,237, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 19.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.23%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.0%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.36%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.0%), bachelor's degree (35.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.9%).