Immigrants from Spain vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,060,074 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Spain communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Spain within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Spain corresponds to an increase of 27.2 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,933 compared to $43,464, a difference of 17.2%), median male earnings ($60,750 compared to $53,237, a difference of 14.1%), and median family income ($113,815 compared to $101,354, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,560 compared to $52,643, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($63,540 compared to $59,848, a difference of 6.2%), and wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.7%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.98%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.1%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.57%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 41.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 44.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%).