Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,622,506 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.238% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 238.3 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $100,141, a difference of 26.5%), median household income ($68,412 compared to $85,054, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($81,852 compared to $101,354, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.5%), median male earnings ($46,656 compared to $53,237, a difference of 14.1%), and median earnings ($40,107 compared to $45,928, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and single female poverty (27.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.1%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.91%), currently married (45.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.7%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.22%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.5%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 9th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.7%).