Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Portuguese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Portuguese

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Average
Poor
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Portuguese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,248,713 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Immigrants from Bangladesh.
Portuguese Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 30.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $92,208, a difference of 14.2%), and median family income ($106,286 compared to $94,665, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $54,714, a difference of 0.51%), median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $39,910, a difference of 0.67%), and median earnings ($48,032 compared to $45,532, a difference of 5.5%).
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income
Income MetricPortugueseImmigrants from Bangladesh
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,362
Poor
$41,709
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,286
Tragic
$94,665
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,976
Tragic
$80,722
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,032
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,663
Tragic
$51,642
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,177
Good
$39,910
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,436
Exceptional
$54,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,429
Tragic
$90,448
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,309
Tragic
$92,208
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,440
Tragic
$55,394
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.9%

Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 62.6%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.33%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 8.0%).
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty
Poverty MetricPortugueseImmigrants from Bangladesh
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Excellent
20.5%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Good
28.8%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
15.9%

Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPortugueseImmigrants from Bangladesh
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
6.4%

Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPortugueseImmigrants from Bangladesh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
30.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.4%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
80.7%

Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.4%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (65.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.5%).
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPortugueseImmigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.8%
Good
30.9%

Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 200.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 90.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 74.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 23.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 51.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 74.4%).
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPortugueseImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
25.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
74.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
38.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
3.9%

Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.2%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level
Education Level MetricPortugueseImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
92.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Tragic
91.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
85.5%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
44.1%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
13.9%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Average
1.8%

Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 89.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.97%).
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability
Disability MetricPortugueseImmigrants from Bangladesh
Disability
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.5%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%