Portuguese vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,591,572 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 11.3 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 43.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $74,257, a difference of 41.8%), and per capita income ($44,362 compared to $31,729, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $35,266, a difference of 13.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $47,012, a difference of 15.8%), and median earnings ($48,032 compared to $38,707, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 107.6%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 92.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.0%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 210.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 202.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 200.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 42.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.82, a difference of 20.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Crow communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 31.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 11th grade (92.0% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.2%), female disability (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.4%).