Portuguese vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,967,062 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.4%), per capita income ($44,362 compared to $46,531, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $42,084, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $105,430, a difference of 0.12%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $99,232, a difference of 0.20%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $90,026, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.98%), single female poverty (20.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.5%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.64%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 47.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.6%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 5.1%).