Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,158,368 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 29.1 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.1%), householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $53,766, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $89,394, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,641 compared to $45,816, a difference of 0.38%), per capita income ($41,131 compared to $41,478, a difference of 0.84%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $88,687, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 17.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.0%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.4%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.30%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 77.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 43.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 18.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.6%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.53%).