Immigrants from Ghana vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,508,589 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $29,031, a difference of 41.7%), median household income ($81,489 compared to $59,159, a difference of 37.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $69,759, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.22%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $33,046, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $42,380, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 100.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 89.4%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 72.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 72.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 49.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.9%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.65, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (63.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 76.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 38.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.0%), bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 56.4%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.10%), 10th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 80.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.7%).