Immigrants from Ghana vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,741,006 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 54.3 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 37.6%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $34,802, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $52,888, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $50,852, a difference of 0.95%), median male earnings ($51,836 compared to $50,878, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $85,836, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.1%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.67%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.4%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 31.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.4%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and currently married (42.7% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 50.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.7%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.5%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.42%), 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and 10th grade (92.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 60.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 45.4%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 2.2%).