Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,420,021 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.262% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 261.7 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $33,931, a difference of 21.2%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $33,236, a difference of 20.0%), and median earnings ($45,641 compared to $39,114, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $50,422, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $52,801, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $78,809, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.0%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.7%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (42.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 104.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 73.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 52.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 61.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.5%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%).