Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,174,469 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.578. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.262% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 262.1 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $103,954, a difference of 18.4%), median household income ($81,489 compared to $93,933, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $106,952, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.41%), per capita income ($41,131 compared to $42,694, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $41,656, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.6%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.4%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.0%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.1%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 112.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 86.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 10.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 31.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 61.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 34.6%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 32.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.62%).