Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,074,327 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.486% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 485.8 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $42,289, a difference of 15.5%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and median male earnings ($59,527 compared to $52,908, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $50,645, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $38,810, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($49,722 compared to $45,598, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 24.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.5%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.17%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.34%).