Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,741,487 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.879. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.111% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 1,111.4 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $55,082, a difference of 12.8%), median male earnings ($59,527 compared to $66,125, a difference of 11.1%), and median family income ($112,038 compared to $123,831, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $54,830, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $69,703, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.27%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.17%), currently married (48.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.9%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.0%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.7%).