Immigrants from England vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,551,389 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.935. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.490% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 490.4 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $79,171, a difference of 38.2%), median family income ($112,038 compared to $81,852, a difference of 36.9%), and per capita income ($48,844 compared to $35,922, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $45,816, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $34,106, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 45.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 15.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.5%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 65.7%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.0%).