Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,068,602 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 304.4 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.1%), per capita income ($48,844 compared to $44,187, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $102,190, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $40,704, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $52,611, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($49,722 compared to $47,925, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.9%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.26%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (49.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.39%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 31.0%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.4%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%).