Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,530,919 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.330. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Immigrants from Germany.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $95,913, a difference of 15.5%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $86,764, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $103,282, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $62,544, a difference of 8.1%), and per capita income ($49,741 compared to $45,751, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 22.3%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.98%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.5%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.63%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%).