Immigrants from Asia vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,241,686 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $29,031, a difference of 71.3%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $59,159, a difference of 68.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $69,759, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.6%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $42,380, a difference of 33.0%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $33,046, a difference of 33.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 144.8%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 136.8%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 122.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 52.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 58.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 63.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 110.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 104.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 99.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 92.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 57.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.65, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.3%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 95.3%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 91.6%), and bachelor's degree (44.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 87.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.11%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 68.8%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 64.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.0%).